Varun Vemulapalli

Day 42 of 100 · Phase 5: How AI agents work

Agent patterns

2 min readBy Varun Vemulapalli

Most useful AI "agents" in business are not one giant brain. They're a few simple patterns, wired together.

Learn four of them and you can sketch almost any AI workflow on a whiteboard.

Video explainer · 2:06
Key takeaway

Chaining, routing, parallel and orchestrator–workers are building blocks; pick the simplest one that fits the work.

Day 42 visual: Agent patterns
The visual from the original post.

The concept

An agent pattern is a reusable way to arrange model calls, tools and code. Like process diagrams: a few shapes, endless combinations.

Four you'll see everywhere:

  • Chaining: step A's output feeds step B, then C. Each step is small and checkable.
  • Routing: first classify the input, then send it to the specialist that fits.
  • Parallel: run independent checks at the same time, then combine the results.
  • Orchestrator–workers: one coordinator splits a task, hands out subtasks, and assembles the answer.

Walkthrough: insurance claims intake

Imagine 2,000 first notice of loss emails a week.

1) Chaining: extract → validate → summarize

  • Extract: policy number, date of loss, claim type, description.
  • Validate (plain code, not AI): is the policy active on that date? Any required field missing?
  • Summarize: a 5-line brief for the adjuster.

If validation fails, the chain stops and asks for the missing info.

2) Routing: auto / home / health

  • A quick classifier reads the claim and picks a lane.
  • Each lane has its own specialist prompt: collision rules for auto, water vs fire damage for home, benefit codes for health.

3) Parallel: fraud check and coverage check at once

  • Neither needs the other's answer.
  • Say each takes 20 seconds. In sequence: 40 seconds. In parallel: about 20.

4) Orchestrator–workers: the messy claim

  • A home claim mentions a burst pipe, a damaged car in the garage and a hotel stay.
  • The orchestrator splits it: a worker for home damage, one for auto, one for additional living expenses.
  • It merges the three findings into one summary for the adjuster.

Which pattern when?

  • Steps always the same? Chaining.
  • Inputs come in clear types? Routing.
  • Checks independent of each other? Parallel.
  • Can't know the subtasks until you see the input? Orchestrator–workers.

Start simple. More moving parts means more cost and more places to fail.

Where you see it at work

  • Insurance: intake, triage and adjuster briefs, with humans deciding the claim.
  • Banking: routing customer messages to disputes, cards or lending.
  • Healthcare: chaining prior-authorization requests: extract, check criteria, draft.
  • Business analysis: these map onto the process flows you already draw.

In one sentence

Chaining, routing, parallel and orchestrator–workers are building blocks; pick the simplest one that fits the work.

Your turn: which process at your work is a chain, and which needs a router? 👇

Join the discussion on LinkedIn